Titouan Droguet vs Cezar Cretu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Jul at 06:31 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Droguet vs C. Cretu

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Droguet 1 - 0 Cretu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Titouan Droguet winning 2 and Cezar Cretu winning 0. The last match between Titouan Droguet and Cezar Cretu was at the Iasi Challenger, 07-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Titouan Droguet getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Droguet | 1 |
| Cretu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Iasi Challenger(07-07-25)
T. Droguet vs C. Cretu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $413,470 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.94% (263-142) | Career Total W/L | 68.36% (296-137) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 11 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 66.67% (2-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
T. Droguet vs C. Cretu Match Preview:
- Second Serve: Cretu wins 38.26% on their second serve, while Droguet performs better with 47.97%. Could this advantage help Droguet?
- Return Game: Cretu has an edge in returning, with 46.92% wins on second serves and 31.9% on first serves, compared to Droguet's 42.55% and 25.73% respectively.
- Under Pressure: Droguet outperforms Cretu in saving breakpoints, holding a 55.61% success rate compared to Cretu's 47.58%.
- Overall Performance: Both players have similar match win rates over the past year, with Cretu at 58.21% and Droguet slightly ahead at 59.02%.
- Best Surface: Cretu excels on Clay with 69% wins, while Droguet shines on Hard courts with the same rate. How might the surface impact the game?
- Player Level: Cretu predominantly competes in Futures/ITF $10K events, while Droguet plays mainly in Challengers, indicating differing competitive exposure.
- Opponent Quality: Droguet has faced stronger opponents, with an average rank of 237.05, compared to Cretu's 490.25.
- Deciding Sets: Droguet is more successful in deciding sets, winning 65% versus Cretu's 46%.
- Break Point Conversion: Cretu converts break points more often at 37.58%, giving them potential leverage in crucial moments over Droguet’s 30.56%.
Editorial Prediction (July 7, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing these head-to-head statistics provides a comprehensive understanding of both players' recent forms, strengths, and weaknesses. While Cretu shows exceptional ability in return games and break point conversion, their performance under pressure and against high-ranked opponents suggests room for improvement.
Droguet’s main advantages are demonstrated in second serve performance, breakpoint defense, and contesting stronger opponents, reflecting a battle-hardened edge. The match being contested on a Hard court could further tip the scales, given Droguet’s proficiency on this surface.
Considering these factors, especially Droguet's experience and performance under pressure, Droguet appears to have the upper hand going into this match. Thus, Droguet is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis showdown.
Titouan Droguet vs Cezar Cretu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Droguet vs C. Cretu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:22:23 | Average Match Time | 1:22:23 |
| 63% (37/59) | 1st Serve % | 57% (27/47) |
| 78% (29/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (20/27) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (5/20) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (22/47) | Return Points Win % | 32% (19/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Droguet Recent Matches Played
C. Cretu Recent Matches Played

T. Droguet vs C. Cretu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.94% (263/142) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.36% (296/137) |
| 61.76% (583/361) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.04% (627/352) |
| 54.73% (4898/4052) | Games Win/Loss | 55.41% (5051/4064) |
| 66.67% (50/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (36/24) |
| 68.25% (144/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.84% (257/111) |
| 57.66% (64/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1932 | Aces Total | 787 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 705 | Total Double Faults | 868 |
| 1:35:8 | Average Match Time | 1:26:36 |
| 411.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 474.85 |
| 61% (16271/26754) | 1st Serve % | 64% (15171/23635) |
| 71% (11587/16271) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9964/15171) |
| 52% (5406/10483) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4234/8464) |
| 42% (1154/2727) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1327/2840) |
| 40% (10847/26923) | Return Points Win % | 44% (10609/24034) |
| 56.52% (13/10) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (4/0) |
| 52.00% (13/12) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 62.28% (104/63) | Challenger W/L | 53.13% (34/30) |
| 71.12% (133/54) | Futures W/L | 71.07% (258/105) |
| 66% (259/395) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (288/424) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (63/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (50/95) |
| 57% (77/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (80/124) |
| 88% (255/224) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (274/252) |
| 12% (255/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (274/22) |
| 25% (150/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (157/42) |